Build with agents.Move with integrity.
Your ideas, requirements, and work—connected.
From the first conversation to the final approval.
| Name | Priority | Status | Health | Lead | Target date | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Field inspection system4 / 4 | Field inspection system4 / 4 | |||||||
| Offline inspections | Urgent | In Progress | On track | Sep 18 | ||||
| Supervisor approval | High | In Progress | On track | Sep 21 | ||||
| Review evidence & audit trail | Medium | In Review | On track | Sep 24 | ||||
| Inspection checklists | High | Completed | On track | Sep 15 | ||||
| Connected agent workflows3 / 3 | Connected agent workflows3 / 3 | |||||||
| Project onboarding | Medium | Completed | On track | Sep 12 | ||||
| Specification to implementation | High | In Progress | On track | Sep 25 | ||||
| Human review checkpoints | Medium | Planned | On track | Sep 28 | ||||
| Operational readiness1 / 1 | Operational readiness1 / 1 | |||||||
| Release approval & retained evidence | Medium | Planned | On track | Oct 02 | ||||
One lifecycle for every change.
From the first question to Done.
01 · Interview
Agree on the idea before anything is written.
Your agent asks one question at a time, with its best guess, until it can state what you want and why. Nothing changes until you confirm.
- You run
/interview-me- It produces
- A confirmed statement of intent
- Next
- Spec turns it into requirements.
Offline inspections
Thought3s
I read the inspection code. I think you want inspectors to complete inspections without a connection.
Still open: who closes an inspection, and how you judge success.
Can an inspection close while offline, or only after it syncs?
My guess: drafts save offline and closing waits for sync, because closing calls the server today (code).
Thought2s
Here is what I think you want:
- OutcomeInspectors finish inspections without a connection.
- TodayInspections need a connection.
- SuccessNo inspection is lost offline.
- ConstraintClosing needs sync and supervisor approval.
- Out of scopePhoto annotation.
Is that right, or should I refine it?
Give your agents the requirements
behind the work.
Intuitive requirements workspace
Go from time-consuming requirements processes to a working, review-ready source library in minutes.
Access Control Requirements
Complete audit trail
Follow comments, health updates, and property changes on every project.
Jamie Davis changed status to In Progress.
Jamie Davis set the target date to Sep 18.
Review changed requirements
See exactly what changed at a glance — approve or request changes with a single click.
2 fields changed
Immutable baselines
Lock snapshots for certification and detect version drift at a glance.
Access Control Requirements
LockedRealtime collaboration
Work together live on requirements with your team.
Requirements management. Full certification lifecycle. Integrated as a platform.
Compliance ready.
Requirements traceability for every safety-critical sector, built on IEC 61508 functional safety principles, is coming to Integrity.
RAMS & signalling safety
RAMS lifecycle and signalling safety management. Trace requirements from concept to decommissioning with full audit trails.
Airborne systems certification
Airborne software and hardware assurance. Manage objectives, verification activities, and certification evidence across design assurance levels.
Functional safety & process
Functional safety lifecycle for road vehicles. Track ASILs, safety goals, and verification evidence with process maturity assessment.
Device software & risk management
Medical device software lifecycle and risk management. Link software requirements to risk controls and maintain regulatory traceability.
I&C systems safety
Instrumentation and control systems for nuclear facilities. Manage safety classification, qualification evidence, and V&V activities.
System safety & SE lifecycle
System safety and systems engineering for defense and space programs. Track hazard analyses, safety requirements, and lifecycle evidence.